Arb-med-arb tartib-taomilida bir shaxsning hakam va vositachi sifatida ishtirok etishining afzalliklari va kamchiliklari.
Keywords:
arb-med-arb, nizolarni hal qilish, Singapur protokoli, betaraflik, arbitrning xolisligi, arbitraj sharti.Abstract
Bugungi kunda nizolarni hal qilishning ilg'or usullaridan biri bu arbitraj-mediatsiya-arbitraj protsedurasi (bundan buyon matnda arb-med-arb deb yuritiladi), bu nizolarni hal qilishning gibrid shakli bo'lib, nizoni tinch yo'l bilan hal qilish imkoniyatini va qaror qabul qilish uchun huquqiy javobgarlikni birlashtiradi., arbitraj samaradorligi va mediatsiyaning maxfiyligi.
Hozirgi vaqtda milliy qonun va tartib-qoidalarda, shu jumladan o'zbek, huquqiy baza va uni amalga oshirishning amaliy vositalari shakllanish bosqichida, Singapur xalqaro arbitraj markazi (SIAC) va Singapur mediatsiya markazi (SIMC) kabi jahon institutlari ushbu protsedura uchun muvaffaqiyatli dasturlarni ishlab chiqishga muvaffaq bo'lishdi.yuritiladi), bu nizolarni hal qilishning gibrid shakli bo'lib, nizoni tinch yo'l bilan hal qilish imkoniyatini va qaror qabul qilish uchun huquqiy javobgarlikni birlashtiradi., arbitraj samaradorligi va mediatsiyaning maxfiyligi.
Hozirgi vaqtda milliy qonun va tartib-qoidalarda, shu jumladan o'zbek, huquqiy baza va uni amalga oshirishning amaliy vositalari shakllanish bosqichida, Singapur xalqaro arbitraj markazi (SIAC) va Singapur mediatsiya markazi (SIMC) kabi jahon institutlari ushbu protsedura uchun muvaffaqiyatli dasturlarni ishlab chiqishga muvaffaq bo'lishdi.
References
Alexander, N. M. (2021). How is med-arb regulated in Hong Kong? Singapore Management University School of Law; Centre for Digital Law; Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy, p. 18.
Arbitration Act, RSBC 1996, c 55; British Columbia International Commercial Arbitration Centre. (1998). Domestic Commercial Arbitration Rules of Procedure (As amended June 1, 1998) as printed August 1998, s. 35.
Kagel, S. (1973). Alternative techniques—Combining mediation and arbitration, pp. 72–73.
Limbury, A. L. (2011, August 18). Getting the best of both worlds with MED–ARB. Law Society Journal.
Matteucci, G. (2019, July 31). Mediation and judiciary in Italy 2019, p. 50.
McKinnon, K., & Stuart, A. (2019, December 17). Two hats, or not two hats? Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP.
https://www.osler.com/en/insights/updates/two-hats-or-not-two-hats/
Ng, C. (2020). The Arb-Med-Arb protocol: Promising in concept, problematic in design. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 32, 125–127.
Nigmatullina, D. (2021, December 15). The use of mediation and arbitration in combination: What does the empirical data say? CIS Arbitration Forum.
Priemel, K. C. (2021). Changing hats: Nuremberg’s visible college and the politics of internationalism, 1941–1949. In M. M. Payk & K. C. Priemel (Eds.), Crafting the international order: Practitioners and practices of international law since c.1800 (The History and Theory of International Law). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863830.003.0009
SIAC & SIMC. (2014, November 5). Arb-Med-Arb protocol between Singapore International Arbitration Centre and Singapore International Mediation Centre. Singapore International Mediation Centre.
https://siac.org.sg/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SIAC-Rules-2016-Russian-version_Complete.pdf
Yip, M. (2021). Combinations of mediation and arbitration: The Singapore perspective. In A. (Ed.), General trends(Chap. 8). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568290.009
Закон Китайской Народной Республики «Об арбитраже» (1994), ст. 51. 中华人民共和国仲裁法 [Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China].
