RESEARCHER POSITIONALITY IN QUALITATIVE AND MIXED-METHODS RESEARCH: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS, PRACTICAL CHALLENGES, AND REFLEXIVE STRATEGIES
Keywords:
researcher positionality, reflexivity, qualitative research, mixed methods, insider research, epistemology, trustworthiness, educational researchAbstract
Researcher positionality — the constellation of a researcher's social identities, prior experiences, values, and epistemological commitments that shape every stage of the research process — has received increasing attention in qualitative and mixed-methods educational research over the past three decades. Yet many researchers, particularly those conducting their first large-scale study, encounter positionality as an abstract methodological requirement rather than a genuinely lived challenge with concrete consequences for data quality, interpretive validity, and ethical rigour. This article reviews the theoretical foundations of positionality as a methodological concept, examines the specific challenges it poses across the research cycle — from question formulation through data collection, analysis, and representation — and synthesises the reflexive strategies that the literature recommends for managing its influence productively. Particular attention is given to the distinctive positionality challenges faced by researchers who study their own communities, those who hold ideological commitments to the populations they research, and those conducting educational research in non-Western institutional contexts where Western methodological frameworks do not translate straightforwardly. The article argues that positionality is not a problem to be solved but a resource to be managed — and that researchers who engage with it honestly produce more trustworthy, more contextually grounded, and ultimately more useful knowledge than those who treat it as a methodological inconvenience to be minimised or concealed.
References
Bourke, B. (2014). Positionality: Reflecting on the research process. The Qualitative Report, 19(33), 1–9.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Chavez, C. (2008). Conceptualizing from the inside: Advantages, complications, and demands on insider positionality. The Qualitative Report, 13(3), 474–494.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE.
Dwyer, S. C., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63.
Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). SAGE.
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and "ethically important moments" in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Merriam, S. B., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M. Y., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G., & Muhamad, M. (2001). Power and positionality: Negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(5), 405–416.
Ortlipp, M. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 695–705.
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
Temple, B., & Young, A. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 161–178.
Unluer, S. (2012). Being an insider researcher while conducting case study research. The Qualitative Report, 17(58), 1–14.
