Organizational and Managerial Mechanisms for Monitoring the Quality of Education in the Education System of Uzbekistan
Keywords:
education quality monitoring; organizational mechanisms; managerial mechanisms; quality assurance; education management; Uzbekistan education systemAbstract
This section examines the organizational and managerial mechanisms for monitoring the quality of education within the education system of the Republic of Uzbekistan. In the context of ongoing educational reforms, quality monitoring has become a key instrument for improving governance efficiency, ensuring compliance with state educational standards, and enhancing learning outcomes. The study analyzes the institutional framework, regulatory and legal foundations, and management practices that support education quality monitoring at national and institutional levels. Particular attention is paid to the role of state authorities, internal quality assurance units, and data-driven management tools. The interaction between internal and external quality assurance mechanisms is also explored. The findings indicate that effective organizational structures and feedback-based management processes contribute significantly to continuous quality improvement in Uzbekistan’s education system. At the same time, existing challenges related to institutional capacity and analytical competencies highlight the need for further development of monitoring mechanisms.
References
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020). Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Education” (No. ZRU–637). Tashkent.
President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2019). Decree on the approval of the Concept for the Development of the Higher Education System of the Republic of Uzbekistan until 2030 (Decree No. PF–5847). Tashkent.
Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2017). Resolution on the establishment of the State Inspectorate for Supervision of Quality in Education. Tashkent.
Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovation of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022). Quality assurance in higher education: Policy framework. Tashkent.
Ministry of Preschool and School Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2021). National standards for monitoring the quality of general education. Tashkent.
Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34.
OECD. (2015). Education policy outlook: Making reforms happen. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2017). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
UNESCO. (2016). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2018). Quality assurance and accreditation in higher education. Paris: UNESCO.
European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). (2015).
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). Brussels.
Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schindler, L. A., Puls-Elvidge, S., Welzant, H., & Crawford, L. (2015). Definitions of quality in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(3), 3–13.
Martin, M., & Stella, A. (2007). External quality assurance in higher education:
