Modeling Economic Growth in Uzbekistan: A Solow Model Approach

Authors

  • Abduvalieva Nilufar Maxamadnosir qizi Westminster International University in Tashkent, Editorial administrative officer

Keywords:

Economic Growth, Solow Growth Model, Uzbekistan, Human Capital, Physical Capital, Labor Force Participation, Total Factor Productivity.

Abstract

This study investigates the economic growth of Uzbekistan from 1999 to 2022 using the Solow Growth Model. The analysis employs time series data from the World Bank to estimate the contributions of physical capital, human capital, and labor force participation to real GDP growth. The results indicate that both human capital, measured by government expenditure on higher education, and physical capital, measured by gross capital formation, have statistically significant positive effects on economic growth. However, labor force participation was found to be statistically insignificant, possibly due to data limitations. The model explains 97.69% of the variation in real GDP, confirming its overall significance. The findings suggest that policymakers should prioritize investments in human capital to sustain long-term economic growth, while further research using panel data is recommended for more robust insights.

References

Arratibel, O., Heinz, F.F., Martin, R., Przybyla, M., Rawdanowicz, L., Serafini, R. and Zumer, T., 2007. Determinants of growth in the central and eastern European EU members states- a production function approach. ECB Occasional Paper No. 61. Frankfurt: European Central Bank. Available from: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecbocp61.pdf

Barossi-Filho, M., Silva, R.G. and Diniz, E.M., 2005. The Empirics of the Solow Growth Model: Long-Term Evidence. Journal of Applied Economics, 8(1), pp.31-51.

Campos, N.F. and Coricelli, F., 2002. Growth in Transition: What We Know, What We Don't, and What We Should. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(3), pp.793-836.

Fischer, S., Sahay, R. and Végh, C.A., 1996. Stabilization and growth in transition economies: The early experience. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2), pp.45-66.

Kutan, A.M. and Wyzan, M.L., 2005. Explaining the real exchange rate in Kazakhstan, 1996-2003: Is Kazakhstan vulnerable to the Dutch disease? Economic Systems, 29(2), pp.242-255.

Mankiw, N.G., Romer, D. and Weil, D.N., 1992. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), pp.407-437.

Melihovs, A. and Davidsons, G., 2006. The role of production progress and human capital in the economic growth of Latvia. [online] Available from: https://www.makroekonomika.lv/sites/default/files/production_progress_human_capital_economic_growth.pdf [Accessed Day Month Year].

Pomfret, R., 2000. The Uzbek Model of Economic Development, 1991-1999. Economics of Transition, 8(3), pp.733-748.

Schiliro, D., 2017. A Glance at Solow’s Growth Theory. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(2), pp.83-103.

Solow, R.M., 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), pp.65-94.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-11

How to Cite

Abduvalieva Nilufar Maxamadnosir qizi. (2025). Modeling Economic Growth in Uzbekistan: A Solow Model Approach. SAMARALI TA’LIM VA BARQAROR INNOVATSIYALAR JURNALI, 3(11), 78–85. Retrieved from https://innovativepublication.uz/index.php/jelsi/article/view/4510