FROM MOTIVATION TO MASTERY: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE SYNTHESIS OF GAMIFIED AND GAME-BASED APPROACHES IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

Authors

  • Eshankulov Shuxrat Teacher of English language department Jizzakh State pedagogical university

Keywords:

gamification, game-based learning, online learning, motivation, engagement, higher education, instructional design

Abstract

This paper synthesizes empirical and theoretical research comparing gamification and game-based learning (GBL) in online learning environments across higher education and professional contexts. Drawing upon Self-Determination Theory, Flow Theory, and Cognitive Load Theory, the study reviews empirical findings from 2012–2025 to evaluate how these approaches influence motivation, engagement, learning outcomes, and retention. Evidence suggests that both strategies can enhance engagement and learning, but they differ in scope and sustainability. Gamification improves short-term participation and measurable task performance, while GBL supports intrinsic motivation, deep learning, and long-term retention through meaningful interaction and narrative immersion. Design quality—particularly autonomy, feedback, narrative fidelity, and inclusivity—moderates effectiveness. This synthesis concludes that hybrid frameworks integrating gamified reinforcement with game-based learning contexts yield optimal outcomes in online education.

References

Cavus, N., Ibrahim, I., Okonkwo, M. O., Ayansina, N. B., & Modupeola, T. (2022). The effects of gamification in education: A systematic literature review. Revista Românească pentru Educație Multidimensională, 14(2), 452–470. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.2/452

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 9–15). ACM.

Gafni, R., & Gafni, N. (2022). Incorporating fantasy into gamification promotes student learning and quality of online interaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00335-9

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377

López-Fernández, D., Gordillo, A., Pérez, J., & Tovar, E. (2024). Learning and motivational impact of game-based learning: Comparing face-to-face and online formats. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.07762

Madero-Gonzalez, C., Vázquez-Hernández, J., & González-Aleu, F. (2024). The impact of gamification on meaningful learning and student performance in an undergraduate online engineering course. Quality Assurance in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-08-2024-0163

Tonhão, S., Shigenaga, M., Medeiros, A., & Steinmacher, I. (2024). Gamification in software engineering education: A tertiary study. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.05209

Zhang, Q., & Yu, Z. (2022). Investigating and comparing the effects on learning achievement and motivation for gamification and game-based learning: A quantitative study employing Kahoot. Education Research International, 2022, Article 9855328. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9855328

Downloads

Published

2025-11-05

How to Cite

Eshankulov Shuxrat. (2025). FROM MOTIVATION TO MASTERY: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE SYNTHESIS OF GAMIFIED AND GAME-BASED APPROACHES IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. SAMARALI TA’LIM VA BARQAROR INNOVATSIYALAR JURNALI, 3(10), 700–705. Retrieved from https://innovativepublication.uz/index.php/jelsi/article/view/4457