Monopoly behaviour of the DeBeers Diamond Company

Authors

  • Dilafruz Kuchkorova PhD candidate, Westminster International University in Tashkent

Abstract

Monopoly is the dominating one firm in the market, there is no competitors or no
other substitute firms in the market. Monopoly has an ability to set price on his own
product. Many researches have been analysed the efficiency of monopoly and its effects to
consumer behaviour. The inefficiency of Monopoly is proved by price is above the
marginal cost and it causes the shortage of product in the market. Thus, monopolist
produces and sells the limited quantity of product and it is below the rank the social
efficient level.
This coursework has been conducted on the monopoly behaviour of
DeBeers Diamond Company. In the Introduction section numerous papers on the efficiency
of a monopolistic market have been revived and analysed. In the body part natural barriers
to entry, unfair competition of computer software markets, monopoly pricing and social
cost of diamond market have been discussed, and in final part how social cost occurs the
government intervention to the market have been demonstrated.

References

Andrews. A.E., (2006) "Diamond Is Forever: De Beers, the Kimberely Process, and the

Efficacy of Public

and Corporate Co-Regulatory Initiatives in Securing Regulatory

Compliance Note," South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business: Vol. 2:

Iss. 1, Article 7. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scjilb/vol2/iss1/7

Ariovich.G., (2002) The Economics of Diamond Price Movements. Wiley. Managerial

and Decision

Economics, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Dec., 1985), pp. 234-240

Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2487029. Accessed: 22-11-2019 07:10 UTC

Greenl

aw, S.,&Shapiro, D. Principles of economics 2e. 2nd ed. OpenStax2011., pp.246

Gumush, E. (2006). The Social Costs of Monopoly: A Survey and an Evolution. Munich

Personal RePEc

Archive, [online] (42107). Available at: https://mpra.ub.uni

muenchen.de/42107/ [Accessed 21 Nov. 2019].

Harberger, A. (1954). Monopoly and Resurce Allocation. American Economic Review.

Haufler V,(2003) Globalization and Industry SelfRegulation, in GOVERNANCE IN A

GLOBAL ECONOMY: POLITICAL AUTHORITY IN TRANSITION 227-8

Mankish N.G.,(2008)Principles of Economics 6e,South-Western Cengage Learning

Principles of Economics, 6E( 2008)Chapter 15,

McAdams,D.,&Reavis, C.,(2008) DeBeers‟s Diamond Dilemma. MIT Slogan

Management.

Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24870223. Accessed: 21-11-2019 03:45 UTC

Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2015). Microeconomics (8th global edition ed.).

Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.

Varian, H. R. (2010). Intermediate Microeconomics (8th ed.). New Delhi: Affiliated East

West Press Private Limited.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-14

How to Cite

Dilafruz Kuchkorova. (2025). Monopoly behaviour of the DeBeers Diamond Company. SAMARALI TA’LIM VA BARQAROR INNOVATSIYALAR JURNALI, 3(7), 128–139. Retrieved from https://innovativepublication.uz/index.php/jelsi/article/view/3782