ON THE ISSUE OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF CERAMIC IMPLANTS IN THE PROVISION OF ORTHOPEDIC CARE

Authors

  • Furkatov Shokhjakhon, Latipov Zhurabek, Odilov Bakhodir, Mustafoyev Aziz Samarkand State Medical University

Keywords:

ceramic implants, zirconium dioxide, orthopedic care, dental implantology.

Abstract

When organizing orthopedic care, specialists should be aware of scientific
data on the ability of the used zirconium dioxide implant system to osseointegration. The
biological compatibility of implants depends on various parameters such as the nature of the
material, chemical composition, surface topography, chemical composition and load, surface
treatment, physical and mechanical properties. Zirconium has a high biocompatibility with
soft tissues, resistance to bacterial biofilms. Zirconium dioxide implants are a promising
alternative to titanium, especially for patients with titanium allergies.

References

Koller M., Steyer E., Theisen K., Stagnell S., Jakse N., Payer M. Two-piece zirconia

versus titanium implants after 80 months: Clinical outcomes from a prospective

randomized pilot trial // Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 31(4): 388–396. DOI:

1111/clr.13576;

Borges H., Correia A.R.M., Castilho R.M., de Oliveira Fernandes G.V. Zirconia Implants

and Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies //

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020; 35(4): 707–720. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.8097

Thiem D.G.E., Stephan D., Kniha K. et al. German S3 guideline on the use of dental

ceramic implants // Int J Implant Dent. 2022; 8(1): 43. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-022-00445-

z

Duddeck D.U., Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. et al. Quality Assessment of Five

Randomly Chosen Ceramic Oral Implant Systems: Cleanliness, Surface Topography, and

Clinical Documentation // Int J Oral ol.Maxillofac Implants. 2021; 36(5): 863–874. DOI:

11607/jomi.8837

Berryman Z., Bridger L., Hussaini H.M., Rich A.M., Atieh M., Tawse-Smith A. Titanium

particles: An emerging risk factor for peri-implant bone loss // Saudi Dent J. 2020; 32(6):

–292. DOI: 10.1016/j. sdentj.2019.09.008

Nemec M., Behm C., Maierhofer V. et al. Effect of Titanium and Zirconia Nanoparticles

on Human Gingival Mesenchymal Stromal Cells // Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(17): 10022.

DOI: 10.3390/ ijms231710022

Sivaraman K., Chopra A., Narayan A.I., Balakrishnan D. Is zirconia a viable alternative to

titanium for oral implant? A critical review // J Prosthodont Res. 2018; 62(2): 121–133.

DOI: 10.1016/j. jpor.2017.07.003

Thomé G., Sandgren R., Bernardes S. et al. Osseointegration of a novel injection molded

-piece ceramic dental implant: a study in minipigs // Clin Oral Invest. 2021; 25: 603–615.

DOI: 10.1007/ s00784-020-03513-z

Aragoneses J., Valverde N.L., Fernandez-Dominguez M. et al. Relevant Aspects of

Titanium and Zirconia Dental Implants for Their Fatigue and Osseointegration Behaviors

// Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(11): 4036. DOI: 10.3390/ma15114036

Bezdetko G.I., Shkatova E.Yu. Kachestvo zhizni pacientov, poluchivshix uslugu

protezirovaniya zubov na implantatax [Quality of life of patients who received dental

prosthetics on implants]. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya:

novaya social`naya politika i kachestvo zhizni: issledovaniya i prognozy` [International

Scientific and Practical Conference: New Social Policy and Quality of life: research and

forecasts]. 2017: 66-71 (In Russian)

Sadowsky S.J. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? // A

review. Dent Mater. 2020; 36(1): 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.08.100

Duan C., Ye L., Zhang M., et al. Clinical performance of zirconium implants compared

to titanium implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled

trials // Peer J. 2023; 11: e15010. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15010

Фуркатов Ш.Ф., Хазратов А.И. ПОСЛЕДСТВИЯ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ

СЛАВЯНСКОГО СМЯГЧАЮЩЕГО СРЕДСТВА ДЛЯ РЕПАРАЦИИ ПРОТЕЗОВ

ПАРОДОНТАЛЬНОГО ОТДЕЛА // Молодежный инновационный вестник. - 2023.

- Т. 12. - №S2. - C. 467-470.

Ахмедов А. А., Фуркатов Ш. Ф., Aнвapoвнa Х. М. ПОЛНЫЙ ЦИФРОВОЙ

РАБОЧИЙ ХОД ДЛЯ ИЗГОТОВЛЕНИЯ СКОРОТЕЧНОЙ РЕСТАВРАЦИИ С

ОПОРОЙ НА ИМПЛАНТАТЫ: КЛИНИЧЕСКИЙ СЛУЧАЙ И НОВЫЙ МЕТОД

//MODELS AND METHODS FOR INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF

INNOVATIVE RESEARCH. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 20. – С. 106-115.

Исматов Ф. А., Мустафоев А. А., Фуркатов Ш. Ф. АНАЛИЗ ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТИ

НЕСТЕРОИДНЫХ АНТИВОСПОЛИТЕЛЬНЫХ ПРЕПАРАТОВ ПРИ

ИЗЛЕЧЕНЬЕ ВЕРХНЕЧЕЛЮСТНОГО АЛЬВЕОЛИТА //THEORY AND

ANALYTICAL ASPECTS OF RECENT RESEARCH. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 12. – С. 49-

Исхакова З. Ш. и др. Использование остеогенного материала для замещения

полостных дефектов челюстей //Formation of psychology and pedagogy as

interdisciplinary sciences. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 15. – С. 43-48.

Rizaev J. A. et al. Clinical and radiological characteristics of periodontic interweaves in

patients with chew recessional //European Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and

Development. – 2023. – Т. 11. – С. 36-41.

Фуркатов Ш. Ф., Хaтaмoвa М. A. ПPИМЕНЕНИЯ ВPЕМЕННЫХ НЕCЪЕМНЫХ

ЗУБНЫХ ПPOТЕЗOВ ПPИ ДЕНТAЛЬНOЙ ИМПЛAНТAЦИИ //АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ

ВОПРОСЫ СТОМАТОЛОГИИ. – 2023. – С. 814-820.

Rizaev J. A. et al. The need of patients with systemic vasculitis and coronavirus infection

in the treatment of periodontal diseases //Applied Information Aspects of Medicine

(Prikladnye informacionnye aspekty mediciny). – 2022. – Т. 25. – №. 4. – С. 40-45.

Ризаев Ж. А., Нарзиева Д. Б., Фуркатов Ш. Ф. РЕГИОНАРНАЯ

ЛИМФОТРОПНАЯ ТЕРАПИЯ ПРИ ФУРУНКУЛАХ И КАРБУНКУЛАХ

ЧЕЛЮСТНО-ЛИ-ЦЕВОЙ ОБЛАСТИ //ТОМ-1. – 2022. – С. 386

Downloads

Published

2024-01-29

How to Cite

Furkatov Shokhjakhon, Latipov Zhurabek, Odilov Bakhodir, Mustafoyev Aziz. (2024). ON THE ISSUE OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF CERAMIC IMPLANTS IN THE PROVISION OF ORTHOPEDIC CARE. SAMARALI TA’LIM VA BARQAROR INNOVATSIYALAR JURNALI, 2(1), 561–567. Retrieved from https://innovativepublication.uz/index.php/jelsi/article/view/377